The Ultimate G.A.A. Odyssey

My photo
Brussels, Belgium
A journey of triumph and despair across the roads, railways and skies of Europe, sharing in the relentless mission to develop, sustain and grow a G.A.A. club in the backwaters of the Association.

Monday, June 8, 2009

Backs & Forwards

I may have ranted about this before, I'm not sure. Either way, I'm due another.

I spent years in the corner getting shafted. The game is built for forwards. Generally, the lad kicking the balls in will be placed in the middle of the pitch, isolated and under no pressure. A half forward will make a run and receive a short pass straight into his path. No hope for the wing back. Play continues and forwards being forwards, they fart around with it. A back throws himself into a crowd of traffic and retrieves the ball, bursting through the first tackle. A quick one two and the ball is back in the middle of the pitch.

Immediately after releasing the ball, the back will scan what he left behind trying to identify his man. Too often, by the time he can lock eyes on him, the ball is already floating through the air into his opposite number's arms. The white flag goes up to hurrahs from the fellow swashbucklers. The backs gritty play has already been erased from the memories and at the end of the night the knowledgeable selectors would rather purr over the scintilating points scored by their golden boys.

The game perfectly illustrates the difference in mentality between backs and forwards. Backs outwardly protest their hatred for the game but inwardly they love the doggedness of it all. They know its steels their mind for tough Championship games. The balls relentlessly rain down on top of them and they attack everyone ball like its the last. They'll get well pissed off when that ball floats over their head but they'll keeping driving on.

It will help build the necessary bonds between those in front, behind and too the side of them as each burst a gut to help the other. They'll never give up because even in training they play with their heart on their sleeve and won't want to return to the dressing room with anyone having got the better of him.

The forward on the other hand will saunter around. When the back is too close for comfort, they'll drift off away from the play to 'create space'. If the ball delivered into them isn't right on the money they'll continue the run in the direction of the giver, hands aloft, providing theatre to rival Broadway. If they are forced to make a tackle, you can be pretty sure it will be sloppy and result more often then not, in a free out.

The odd time, the trainer will switch the backs and forwards en masse. I would be surprised if any group of forwards ever got the better of any group of backs anywhere in the world, ever! The backs will run them ragged, playing fast direct ball and ploughing straight through the middle of the pitch. Such is the lack of respect forwards have for tackling, working hard or showing a bit of balls, the game will be an unsatisfying whitewash for the forwards.

Up to a certain level of football, you would take 15 backs over 15 forwards any day of the week. Its only at the top level, maybe the better Intermediate teams up where you really need the bit of class. For the rest, 15 relentless dogs will win more often then not. Maybe thats just the opinion of a back, one who would be pleased to be proved wrong.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

opinionated rants do little to move stuff forward ( ruairi)

Wandering Gael said...

maybe not but tis an age old problem that needs solving. all suggestions welcome!

Anonymous said...

i don't think people go out with the intention of not giving effort. I hold my hand up to some of the things tonight but I'm not interested to take shit week in week out....
Life goes on

Wandering Gael said...

the piece is a general one on backs and forwards and indeed it is an opinionated piece. the bomber just described it as 'nonsense' ridiculing my opinion and protesting loudly in favour of forwards, which is her right and yours too.

Anonymous said...

its been so long since we've done regular bouts of b&fs your post evoked fond memories for me..

and rekindled my opinion that our current training is mundane and not competive enough!

im agreed on the point that backs have regularly get shafted after clearing the ball and leaving their forward obviously free for next ball. what did this ever prove, only that the player can kick a point completely unmarked from play from 30 yards, whoopdidoo!

maybe 15 backs will beat 15 forwards more often than not but this still doesnt change the fact that converted backs make horrendous forwards regardless of the level of competition. in recent times our forward line has been littered with converted dogs making bad decisions, who couldnt kick a point to save their lifes, and most should have gone to specsavers years ago as most are blind to see a pass! nice guys though.

my opinion, a team half filled with backs and forwards will always be better than a team with 15 dogs, eh, sorry, i mean backs!

the phat man.
decent forward, horrendous tackler.

Anonymous said...

Phat Man, if you had been at training this week you might have thought differently (i take your comment on lack of B&F as indicating you weren't there tonight when we did play B&Fs); lots of small games interspersed between necessary running exercises to develop handling. If these games are not cometitive enough, whose fault is that? Personally I think its a hard balancing act between doing the necessary 'dog work' and game based skills improvement. At the end of the day, 'competitive' games only happen if the lads have the legs to keep going right to the end. Just my tuppence worth anyway.

Wandering Gael said...

woo woo woo....lads this is my blog!! phat man...when i was describing the tackling, it was you i had the image of in my head! some poor corner back stuck with no-one within 40 yards of him and nowhere to go....along you come to give him his get out by mauling him!
if im not mistaken...13 of the 15 lads who played courcies were midfielders or backs and we could even argue brian c was a back.
point taken though..to some extent.
not sure who the last anonymous poster was. are you talking about kinsale or belgium?
i think backs and forwards still has its role but used sparingly...games based training definitly the way forward though.

Anonymous said...

eh, "anonymous", im not a belgian player! my comments were relating to daves home club. take some deep breaths my man.

dave- i presume it was me, shur who else! have made conscious effort to improve it and made 2 legal disposessions in macroom game.

phatman
..you are mistaken... brian c is a half forward, derry o c is really a half forward, myself, sin e really.
and youve walked exactly into my point.. weve barely only 3 real forwards on our team... and thats exactly why we average score ONLY 8/9 points a game.

Anonymous said...

whoops signed off above in the wrong place,

anyway twas me , phatman.